How the stream recommendation is actually produced
We don't publish client case studies — what our partner schools run with us stays theirs. What we can do is show you how the assessment works, so you can judge it on its construction rather than on our marketing.
What the assessment measures
120+ items across four sections, answered in about 60–90 minutes. Progress saves as you go.
Academic Strengths & Subject Affinity
Which subjects you gravitate to, how comfortable you already are with them, and how much of that is genuine pull rather than habit.
Aptitude, Cognitive Ability & Logical Reasoning
Timed problems with right and wrong answers — numerical, logical, verbal, data, scientific and spatial reasoning.
Interests, Personality & Working Style
How you prefer to work, how you deal with people, and what kind of problems hold your attention.
Context, Motivation & Decision Certainty
Study discipline, resilience, persistence — and how much of your current stream preference is actually your own.
Sections three and four have no right or wrong answers — they measure preference, not ability. Section two does. Honest answers matter more than clever ones: the scoring is built to detect inconsistent and straight-line responding, and it will flag your report rather than reward it.
How we score it
The principles behind the number on your report.
Parameters are scored separately, then combined
Your answers roll up into 18 parameters, each scored on its own before anything is aggregated. One strong or weak area cannot swing the whole recommendation by itself.
Every stream is measured on the same scale
All six stream paths are scored against the evidence the assessment actually collected for each one, so no stream can win simply by having more questions pointing at it.
The same answers always give the same report
There is no randomness and no model that drifts between students. Two students who answer identically receive identical recommendations — today, and next year.
Confidence is reported, not hidden
When your answers do not point strongly to one stream, the report says so instead of manufacturing a winner. An assessment that always has a confident answer is not measuring anything.
Reviewed independently, validated before launch
The assessment has been reviewed by a practising psychologist. The scoring model was tested by simulation — including against deliberately random answering — before any student took it.
Quality flags travel with the report
Contradictory answers, straight-line responding and a decision that looks driven from outside the student are all flagged on the report rather than quietly ignored. You are told when the input was weak.
What it cannot tell you
An assessment that claims to settle everything is selling something. This one measures aptitude and preference at one point in time, and that is all it measures. It is not an IQ test, it does not predict your board or entrance results, and it is not a psychological diagnosis. It cannot see your circumstances, and it cannot see you changing your mind next year — which students do, legitimately.
Read it as the best available evidence for a decision that has to be made anyway, not as a verdict.
How we handle student data
Most of our users are under 18. These are the specific things we do — stated plainly, so you can hold us to them.
- We do not sell or rent personal information — not to advertisers, not to colleges, not to anyone.
- We run no advertising and no behavioural tracking. We count page visits with cookie-free analytics that only ever shows totals, never individuals. There is nothing on this site profiling your child.
- Your data travels over encrypted connections, and accounts are protected by token-based authentication.
- A school administrator can only ever see students from their own school — the check is enforced on the server, not in the browser.
- Your report is reachable only through an unguessable private link. Nobody sees it unless you send it to them.
- You, or your parent or guardian, can ask us for a copy of your data or ask us to delete it.
Judge it by what it produces
Rather than describe the output, here it is. Both files are generated by the live system from an illustrative profile — no real student's data appears in either.